Intimate partner violence refers to any form of harm caused by a current or former romantic partner. This harm can be physical, emotional, sexual, verbal or financial. This can occur whether or not the couple lives together and often involves ongoing patterns of control or abuse in the relationship.
Children who are exposed to this kind of violence, whether they directly see it, hear it, or even just know that it is happening, can suffer serious emotional and developmental consequences (e.g., affected physiological stress response, executive functioning, attachment, mental health, academic functioning, and social functioning). This exposure is considered a form of child maltreatment, even if the child is not physically harmed.
Intimate partner violence can have serious and lasting consequences for victims, affecting their physical health, mental well-being, and overall safety. Research shows that people who experience intimate partner violence are at higher risk for injuries, chronic health problems like headaches or digestive issues, and complications during pregnancy. Many also face emotional and psychological effects such as anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress, and low self-esteem. Intimate partner violence can make it harder for victims to keep a job, maintain social relationships, or feel safe in their own homes. In some cases, the abuse can become life-threatening. These impacts don’t end when the violence stops, survivors may carry the effects for years without the right support or resources. Therefore, it is important to provide comprehensive support to intimate partner violence survivors, including mental health services, medical care, and social support systems. Addressing the multifaceted impact of intimate partner violence is crucial for the well-being and recovery of those affected.
How to recognize intimate partner violence
Intimate partner violence can take many forms, not all of them physical. Some signs that a person may be experiencing intimate partner violence include:
- Physical abuse: Inflicting physical harm through actions like hitting, slapping or strangulation. Strangulation, in particular, is a dangerous form of assault that can lead to unconsciousness or death within minutes and is recognized as a specific criminal offense in many jurisdictions.
- Emotional and psychological abuse: Undermining a partner's self-worth through constant criticism, humiliation or manipulation. This can also involve gaslighting, where the abuser makes the victim doubt their perceptions or memories.
- Isolation: Controlling a partner's social interactions by limiting contact with family and friends, monitoring communications, or restricting access to information and resources. This tactic increases the victim's dependency on the abuser and reduces opportunities for support.
- Economic abuse: Exerting control by restricting access to financial resources, sabotaging employment opportunities, or accumulating debt in the victim's name.
- Technological abuse: Using technology to monitor, harass or control a partner. This includes tracking devices, unauthorized access to personal accounts, or excessive messaging. Such behaviors can erode privacy and autonomy under the guise of care or concern.
- Using children: Manipulating or threatening to harm children to control the partner. This can involve using children as messengers, making false allegations, or threatening to take custody away.
- Sexual abuse: Forcing or coercing sexual acts without consent, including reproductive coercion, where the abuser controls reproductive choices to maintain dominance.
- Stalking and harassment: Repeatedly following, monitoring or contacting a partner in a way that causes fear or distress. This behavior can persist even after the relationship has ended.
- Threats and intimidation: Using threats of violence, destruction of property or harm to pets to instill fear and compliance.
Safety issues
There are a number of ways individuals who experience abuse can try to protect themselves and their children.
A survivor can file a criminal police report about the abuse, or they can file for an order of protection in civil court. Through an order of protection, the court places restrictions on abusers that can subject them to arrest and jail time. In Missouri, for instance, an order of protection can include provisions such as prohibiting the abuser from contacting the victim, requiring them to stay away from the victim's home or workplace, and granting temporary custody of children to the non-abusive parent.
It is important to note, however, that once a custody order is made or pending in a divorce or paternity case, a custody order cannot be made in an order of protection. If a survivor already has an order of protection in place when the custody case begins, an opposing counsel might suggest dismissing the existing order of protection in favor of a no-contact order in the dissolution case. A no-contact order in a dissolution case does not have criminal penalties, unlike an order of protection. Abusive individuals cannot be arrested for violating a no-contact order, and the police will not enforce no-contact orders contained in a dissolution or custody order.
During a custody court process, survivors have to make several decisions about the future for themselves and their children. The courts greatly emphasize cooperation between separating parents. For example, mediation and joint custody arrangements are routine in custody cases. However, survivors can ask the court to waive mandatory mediation because they are victims of domestic violence. It is important to discuss these issues with an attorney.
If survivors fear for their safety in the courthouse, they can also seek the services of a domestic violence shelter advocate or an escort to take them to court and elsewhere. Survivors can also request for the court marshal or bailiff to use appropriate safety measures in or after court. Marshals and bailiffs might be able to accompany survivors to their vehicle or ask that the abusive partner remain in the courthouse while the survivor leaves. Learn what safety measures a local court can provide.
Dissolution and custody cases
Many individuals who have experienced abuse fear losing custody of their children to an abusive partner. Missouri is a friendly parent state, which means that courts favor granting joint custody. It is the policy of the state that frequent, continuing and meaningful contact with both parents is in children’s best interest. There is an exception to this policy for cases in which the court finds that such contact is not in the best interest of the children, such as in an intimate partner violence situation.
Not all attorneys are knowledgeable about domestic violence. Some attorneys understand better than others the dynamics of domestic violence and have experience with the impacts of domestic violence on custody issues. To locate an experienced attorney, survivors might contact:
- Local victim advocate services: Organizations like True North in Missouri offer shelter, crisis hotlines, and can connect survivors with legal resources.
- Local legal services, such as Legal Aid or Legal Services. Mid-Missouri Legal Services provides free or low-cost legal assistance to eligible individuals, including those facing domestic violence situations.
- Pro Bono and Judicare Programs: Missouri operates organized pro bono and reduced-fee (judicare) programs through regional legal services, providing access to attorneys for those who qualify.
If it is safe to do so, survivors can keep copies, records and personal journals of the following to help with their case:
- Written records of all interactions with the abuser, including exact times and dates children are picked up and returned, dates and amounts of child support paid and owed, and any violations of court orders of protection
- Documentation of abuse, such as police reports, medical records, photographs and claims for crime victim compensation
- Certified copy of marriage certificate, children’s birth certificates and Social Security cards
- Rent receipts, bank statements, utility bills, credit card records, tax information, real estate information and children’s report cards
These documents might be necessary when going to court over custody arrangements or visitation. Survivors might also need them if there are future incidents of abuse or motions to modify custody or child support arrangements.
Types of court-ordered custody
Legal custody is the right and obligation to make decisions about a child’s upbringing, such as those regarding children’s schooling, religion and medical care.
- Sole legal custody is an arrangement in which only one parent has decision-making rights, responsibilities and authority relating to the children.
- Joint legal custody means that the parents share the decision-making rights, responsibilities and authority relating to the children. This means parents must confer with each other in making decisions about their children.
Physical custody describes when a parent has the right to have their children with them.
- Sole physical custody means children reside with one parent, and the noncustodial parent might have specific visitation rights described in a court-ordered parenting plan.
- Joint physical custody means that each parent has significant — but not necessarily equal — periods of time during which the children reside with them. One parent’s address is designated as the address of the children for mailing and educational purposes.
Courts prefer joint custody and always start from the position that joint physical and joint legal custody is preferable. Absent extreme circumstances, courts prefer to have both parents involved in decisions regarding the children. Proving domestic violence is present is one such extreme circumstance that can lead the court to grant sole custody. Individuals who have experienced abuse should consult an attorney about this.
Evidence of domestic violence
If presented with evidence of domestic violence, courts must consider that evidence when making decisions involving custody or visitation. Missouri’s custody statute is not particularly sensitive to domestic violence survivors in several respects. The statute includes language articulating that it is state policy to encourage both parents to participate in decisions affecting the health, education and welfare of the children, and to resolve disputes involving their children amicably through alternative dispute resolution. Participating in joint decision-making or going to alternate dispute resolution such as mediation with an abusive parent might be traumatic or dangerous for survivors.
The custody statute also requires courts to determine custody arrangements to ensure both parents participate in such decisions. It requires that both parents have “frequent, continuing and meaningful contact” with their children so long as it is in the best interests of the children. To the court, survivors might appear to be noncooperative parents when in actuality they are being protective of their children. That is why it is so important in custody cases for attorneys to present strong evidence of domestic violence if survivors do not want abusers to have joint physical and legal custody.
If a court finds that domestic violence has occurred, it must make specific findings of fact to show that a court-ordered custody arrangement best protects the children and the victim of domestic violence from any further harm. The court can award custody to the parent who perpetrated domestic violence if it finds that is in the best interest of the children. If the court finds that a pattern of domestic violence has occurred and still awards custody to the abusive parent, it must issue findings of fact and conclusions of law explaining the award. If the judge does not make these findings, it would be an appealable issue.
Parenting plans
During the custody case, survivors may have to develop a parenting plan. This document states the parents’ wishes regarding a specific written schedule detailing custody, parenting time and residential time for each child with each parent, as well as times and places of transfer of the children. A parenting plan also includes suggested restrictions and limitations on access to other persons and reasons why, a specific written plan for legal custody, and the allocation of responsibility for paying the children’s expenses. The safety of the survivor and children are important, so courts and advocates should provide resources to help with this process.
Be specific when drafting a parenting plan with safety in mind. Survivors know whether their former partners will cooperate or are just appearing cooperative during the divorce process. Get in writing any agreements made during divorce negations. When making these decisions, survivors are advised to think of future dealings with the other parent and the long-term well-being of their children. Survivors are encouraged to think of ways to limit contact with the other parent in the parenting plan, such as by requesting contact only through email or text, or by arranging custody exchanges in public places or at a police department.
If the parents are able to agree on issues contained in the parenting plan, they can submit a joint parenting plan. If the parents do not agree, then each parent submits their parenting plan to the court. The court then makes a determination about which parent’s plan is in the best interest of the children after listening to all of the evidence at trial and order that both parties follow that plan. The court can also reject both parties’ plans and order a parenting plan drafted by the court.
Co-parenting after divorce
If a survivor has continued contact with the other parent as a result of a custody or visitation arrangement, they can consider the following ways to ensure the safety and well-being of themselves and their children:
- Recognize continued abuse and control attempts. If abuse continues, document it. Continue to document interactions with the former spouse as described above in the Safety issues section.
- Set boundaries. Change the locks if the former partner has a key, and decide who is and is not allowed to enter the house. Set and maintain expectations for the abuser to follow during visits with children. Refer to the parenting plan, if necessary, to focus on appropriate topics to discuss and methods of communication to use with your former partner.
- Coordinate the consequences of an abuser's violation of the parenting plan with your attorney, such as suspending contact or filing a restraining order.
- Prioritize safety. Exchange children in a neutral public place or at a police department. Inform teachers and other care providers exactly who does and does not have access to your children.
- Foster positive adjustment for yourself and children. Build a strong support system for yourself by getting involved with others in the community and encourage your children to do the same.
Conclusion
To seek help, individuals experiencing abuse can call the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 1-800-799-SAFE (7233), text “START” to 88788, or chat online at thehotline.org. For the Deaf Crisis Line videophone, call 321-800-3323 or text HAND to 839863. All calls are free and confidential. To get more information or to find a local domestic violence program, call the Missouri Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence (MOCADSV) at 573-634-4161. The coalition is not a direct service provider, but individuals can visit "How to Get Help" on the MOCADSV website for a map of local domestic violence programs across Missouri.
References
- Anderson, K., & Van Ee, E. (2018). Mothers and children exposed to intimate partner violence: A review of treatment interventions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(9), 1955.
- Apata, O. E., Falana, O. E., Hanson, U., Oderhohwo, E., & Oyewole, P. O. (2023). Exploring the effects of divorce on children's psychological and physiological wellbeing. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 49(4), 124-133.
- Bagwell-Gray, M. E., Messing, J. T., & Baldwin-White, A. (2015). Intimate partner sexual violence: A review of terms, definitions, and prevalence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 16(3), 316-335.
- Bastaits, K., & Pasteels, I. (2019). Is joint physical custody in the best interests of the child? Parent–child relationships and custodial arrangements. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(11-12), 3752-3772.
- Bogat, G. A., Levendosky, A. A., & Cochran, K. (2023). Developmental consequences of intimate partner violence on children. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 19(1), 303-329.
- Bradshaw, J., Gutowski, E. R., & Nyenyezi, K. (2024). Intimate partner violence survivors’ perspectives on coping with family court processes. Violence Against Women, 30(1), 101-125.
- Center for Research on Women with Disabilities. (2020). Interpersonal violence: Safety planning. Baylor College of Medicine. Retrieved June 6, 2025.
- Chen, J., Walters, M. L., Gilbert, L. K., & Patel, N. (2020). Sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence by sexual orientation, United States. Psychology of Violence, 10(1), 110.
- Clements, K. A., Sprecher, M., Modica, S., Terrones, M., Gregory, K., & Sullivan, C. M. (2022). The use of children as a tactic of intimate partner violence and its relationship to survivors’ mental health. Journal of Family Violence, 37(7), 1049-1055.
- Crossroads Safehouse. (n.d.). 32 items to pack when escaping domestic violence. Retrieved June 6, 2025.
- Darke, L., Paterson, H., Dhillon, H., & van Golde, C. (2025). Defining gaslighting in intimate partner violence: Insights from victim survivors and support service providers. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. Advance online publication.
- Dokkedahl, S., Kok, R. N., Murphy, S., Kristensen, T. R., Bech-Hansen, D., & Elklit, A. (2019). The psychological subtype of intimate partner violence and its effect on mental health: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Systematic Reviews, 8, 1-10.
- Freed, D., Palmer, J., Minchala, D. E., Levy, K., Ristenpart, T., & Dell, N. (2017). Digital technologies and intimate partner violence: A qualitative analysis with multiple stakeholders. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction, 1(CSCW), 1-22.
- Hardesty, J. L., Ogolsky, B. G., & Akinbode, T. D. (2024). Coparenting and intimate partner violence. Family Court Review, 62(1), 131-145.
- Harper, B., Nwabuzor Ogbonnaya, I., & McCullough, K. C. (2018). The effect of intimate partner violence on the psychosocial development of toddlers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(16), 2512-2536.
- Howell, K. H., Barnes, S. E., Miller, L. E., & Graham-Bermann, S. A. (2016). Developmental variations in the impact of intimate partner violence exposure during childhood. Journal of Injury and Violence Research, 8(1), 43-57.
- Jaffe, P. G., Johnston, J. R., Crooks, C. V., and Bala, N. 2008. Custody disputes involving allegations of domestic violence: Toward a differentiated approach to parenting plans. Family Court Review, 46, 500-522.
- Huang, C. C., Vikse, J. H., Lu, S., & Yi, S. (2015). Children’s exposure to intimate partner violence and early delinquency. Journal of Family Violence, 30, 953-965.
- Lange, A. M., Visser, M. M., Scholte, R. H., & Finkenauer, C. (2022). Parental conflicts and posttraumatic stress of children in high-conflict divorce families. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 15(3), 615-625.
- Missouri Courts. (n.d.). Existing Pro Bono Programs in Missouri. Missouri Courts. Retrieved June 6, 2025.
- Missouri General Assembly. (2024). Section 452.375: Custody—definitions—factors determining custody—prohibited, when. Missouri Revisor of Statutes. Retrieved June 6, 2025.
- Missouri Revised Statutes § 452.375 (2024). Custody — definitions — factors determining custody — prohibited, when — public policy of state — custody options — findings required, when — parent plan required — access to records — joint custody not to preclude child support — support, how determined — domestic violence or abuse, specific findings.
- National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges. (2022). Parenting plans after family court findings of domestic violence: Promoting safety, accountability and healing for victims, perpetrators, and children.
- National Network to End Domestic Violence. (n.d.). Missouri Restraining Orders. WomensLaw.org. Retrieved June 6, 2025.
- National Network to End Domestic Violence. (n.d.). What kind of evidence should I have for my case?. WomensLaw.org. Retrieved June 6, 2025.
- Noonan, C. B., & Pilkington, P. D. (2020). Intimate partner violence and child attachment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Child Abuse & Neglect, 109, 104765.
- Pedro-Carroll, J. (2020). How parents can help children cope with separation/divorce. In R. E. Emery (Ed.), Divorce and separation: According to experts (pp. 14–26). Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development. Retrieved June 7, 2025.
- Pereira, M. E., Azeredo, A., Moreira, D., Brandão, I., & Almeida, F. (2020). Personality characteristics of victims of intimate partner violence: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 52, 101423.
- Postmus, J. L., Hoge, G. L., Breckenridge, J., Sharp-Jeffs, N., & Chung, D. (2020). Economic abuse as an invisible form of domestic violence: A multicountry review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 21(2), 261-283.
- Saunders, D., Faller, K., & Toman, R. (2011). Child custody evaluators’ beliefs about domestic abuse allegations: Their relationship to evaluator demographics, background, domestic violence knowledge and custody-visitation Recommendations. Final Report submitted to the National Institutes of Justice.
- Stark, D. P., Choplin, J. M., & Wellard, S. E. (2019). Properly accounting for domestic violence in child custody cases: An evidence-based analysis and reform proposal. Mich. J. Gender & L., 26, 1.
- Stubbs, A., & Szoeke, C. (2022). The effect of intimate partner violence on the physical health and health-related behaviors of women: A systematic review of the literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 23(4), 1157-1172.
- Walker-Descartes, I., Mineo, M., Condado, L. V., & Agrawal, N. (2021). Domestic violence and its effects on women, children, and families. Pediatric Clinics, 68(2), 455-464.
- Weisberg, D. K. (2016). Property Damage in the Domestic Violence Context. Domestic Violence Report, 22, 17.