Imaster Evaluation Shop
What can it do for you, an Imaster series coordinator?
Evaluation Shop Coordinator: Cynthia Crawford
Evaluation Design Goals: There are two goals of the Imaster evaluation design:
While the Imaster Evaluation Shop has provided instruments and suggested a workable process of collecting data to improve Imaster programming, it's primary purpose is to document and articulate outcomes and impact. Outcomes and impact will be reported at the knowledge change, behavior change, and consequences to society levels. Two types of data: 1. Formative evaluation - Ask the learners to fill out the one page "Feedback Form" periodically at the end of class. We found it to be useful at the end of sessions 2, 4, 6, and 8. Page 4 of each of the three repeated measures also collects formative data. These responses are of primary interest to the presenters and series coordinators. Do not submit any "Feedback Forms" to the evaluation clinic. Retain these at the local level. Don Day and Maryann Redelfs would be great to consult with on formative issues. 2. Summative evaluation - Data will be collected for analysis from through several means.
|
How can the Evaluation Shop be most supportive of
my programming?
|
Odds and Ends
|
This web site is supported in part by the University of Missouri Outreach and Extension Outreach Development Fund.
![]() |
Cynthia Crawford, Internet Master Evaluator Mark Belwood, Webpage Design Updated 10/11/01 |
||
University Outreach and Extension does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability or status as a Vietnam-era veteran in employment or programs. |
|||