New September 2013

Download a free PDF of this publication (224KB). PDF help

Printer-friendly version of this page

Guidelines to reprint or copy

M188, Dairy Grazing: Milk Quality

  • Web access only


Related publications

Use our feedback form for questions or comments about M188.

Find publications

Search MU Extension publications.

ADA Accessibile AddThis Widget
MU Extension near you

Dairy Grazing: Milk Quality

John Middleton
College of Veterinary Medicine
Scott Poock
Extension Associate Professor
College of Veterinary Medicine

Dairy grazing publication series

This publication is one in a series about operating and managing a pasture-based dairy. Although these publications often refer to conditions in Missouri, many of the principles and concepts described may apply to operations throughout the United States.

When dairy farmers think about milk quality, they think of mastitis. Mastitis, inflammation of the udder, is usually caused by a bacterial intra­mammary infection (IMI). This inflammation can be subclinical or clinical. Subclinical mastitis has no obvious clinical signs and is usually revealed by an increased milk somatic cell count (SCC). Clinical mastitis can include any combination of the following signs: changes in milk secretions, such as clots, flakes, color, consistency; and swelling, heat, pain and redness, or erythema, of the affected mammary gland.

Mastitis is the most common and costly of diseases in dairy production. Several costs are associated with mastitis:

  • Financial losses due to subclinical infection — decreased milk production and quality
  • Loss of milk quality premiums
  • Costs due to clinical mastitis cases — milk discard, drug and veterinary costs
  • Costs of culling — mortality and replacement costs

In a Wisconsin study, subclinical losses amounted to roughly 15 percent of the total cost of mastitis, loss of milk quality premiums to 40 percent, treatment costs 20 percent and culling the final 25 percent. The total loss was $257 per case. Financial losses due to subclinical and clinical mastitis tend to overlap because their impacts are not mutually exclusive; for example, subclinical cases may cause production losses and changes in milk quality that lead to premium losses, whereas clinical cases negatively impact milk production and quality and potentially increase treatment costs.

 Milk quality is vital to the dairy producer, processor, retailer and consumer. Milk processors demand that milk meet certain quality parameters to supply the global marketplace. The United States maximum legal limit for bulk tank milk somatic cell count (SCC) is 750,000 cells per milliliter. However, markets outside the U.S. can have more stringent SCC requirements. The European Union, for example, requires that the SCC of bulk tank milk be no greater than 400,000 cells per milliliter, and many U.S. milk processors are thus requiring this level of quality because they export milk products to the European market.

The vast majority of U.S. farmers produce high-quality milk. In 2005, the U.S. average bulk tank SCC was 293,000 cells per milliliter. In 2011, it had dropped to 259,000 cells per milliliter. According to U. S. Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) data, in 2011 the SCC of about 20 percent of U.S. bulk tank shipments was over 400,000 cells per milliliter. These data can also be interpreted to say that only 7 percent of  all U.S. milk came from bulk tank shipments with an SCC over 400,000 cells per milliliter. More than half of all U.S. dairy farms produce milk with a bulk tank SCC under 400,000 cells per milliliter all year long, with nearly 80 percent of all shipments below this level. A recent analysis of Dairy Herd Information Association (DHIA) data showed that since 1995 the average number of cows per herd has tripled, from 50 to 150 cows per herd; milk production has increased by 8 pounds, from 65 to 73 pounds; and SCC has decreased almost 100,000 cells per milliliter, from 304,000 to 217,000 cells per milliliter.

Whether yours is a pasture-based, hybrid or confinement operation, the fundamentals of producing quality milk are the same. These fundamentals lie in three areas: personnel, equipment, and the cows and their environment. This publication covers the importance of personnel and the cows and their environment in milk quality. Building or renovating a milking center and maintaining the equipment is covered in MU Extension publication M187, Dairy Grazing: Facilities Design.

One of the most vital steps in addressing milk quality is setting goals for your farm. Goals will vary from farm to farm and year to year. As milk quality changes, the goals will need to be revised. Improving milk quality has benefits for the physical health of the cows as well as the financial health of the dairy, so the ultimate goal should not be to simply meet the milk shipment standards, but rather to produce the highest quality milk possible. Several parameters can be used as benchmarks for monitoring milk quality. These parameters include bulk tank SCC, preliminary incubation (PI) count, and incidence of clinical mastitis. DHIA records can also be useful in monitoring udder health.

Mastitis pathogens

To understand how to control mastitis, you must first understand the types of bacterial pathogens that cause mastitis, their reservoirs and the clinincal characteristics of these pathogens in the cow. Mastitis pathogens are frequently classified based on their reservoir of infection as contagious or environmental. Contagious pathogens — for example Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus agalactiae, Corynebacterium bovis or Mycoplasma spp. — are generally harbored in the cow’s mammary gland and transmitted between cows during milking by the teat cups and milker’s hands. Environmental pathogens — for example, coliforms, non-agalactiae streptococci and some species of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) — are, as the name suggests,  found in the cow’s environment and are usually acquired between milkings. Some characteristics of the primary causes of mastitis are detailed below.

Staphylococcus aureus

Staphylococcus aureus is the most common cause of contagious mastitis and is one of the most difficult mastitis pathogen to get rid of. It is usually subclinical and can become chronic, with intermittent clinical flare-ups. The milk SCC of the affected cow will fluctuate over time. Staphyloccus aureus  can be very difficult to treat, with dry cow therapy giving the best results. However, cure rates, even with dry cow therapy, are usually low.

Streptococcus agalactiae

Streptococcus agalactiae was once relatively common but, since the introduction of dry cow therapy, has become very uncommon. It will primarily be subclinical, but it will cause persistently high SCC and bacterial counts in the milk. It is an obligate pathogen of the udder — obligate means it cannot survive outside a host — and therefore the only major reservoir for infection is other cattle.

Mycoplasma spp.

Mycoplasma is generally considered a contagious mastitis pathogen. It is seen more commonly in large herds, especially herds that purchase cattle for replacement or expansion. It can infect multiple quarters on the same cow and can cause agalactia, or reduced milk yield. When calves are fed waste milk contaminated with Mycoplasma spp., they can develop mycoplasma infections. The usual signs of mycoplasma infections in calves are pneumonia; joint swellings, or arthritis; and ear infections, or head tilts.

Environmental pathogens

Environmental mastitis pathogens are numerous. The predominant bacteria that cause environmental mastitis on a given farm will depend on bedding type and housing method, such as dry-lot, free-stall or pasture-based. Common environmental pathogens include fecal coliforms, such as Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp.; non-agalactiae streptococci, such as Streptococcus uberis and Streptococcus dysagalactiae; and some species of CNS.

Of these pathogens, the coliforms are most likely to cause severe clinical mastitis, otherwise called toxic mastitis, with signs that include swelling of the udder, watery milk, fever and systemic illness. Coliform mastitis vaccines — for example, J5, J-Vac and Endovac — have diminished the clinical severity of coliform mastitis on many farms.

Numerous types of environmental, or non-agalactiae, streptococci exist. Streptococcal mastisis can vary from an incidental finding that self-cure to strains of Streptococcus uberis that are hard to treat and can act like contagious organisms.

Coagulase-negative staphylococcus (CNS) can be environmental and, like the environmental streptococci, often self-cures. Some species of CNS cause an elevated SCC and some do not.

Diagnosing and monitoring mastitis

Clinical mastitis is easily diagnosed because the cow will have obvious symptoms of disease, which can include changes in the milk secretion, udder or cow. Subclinical mastitis is more difficult to diagnose as the cow, udder and milk have no visibly detectable abnormalities. Hence, other diagnostic tests must be applied. The most common method for detecting subclinical mastitis is to measure the milk SCC. Somatic cells are nucleated host cells and in the normal udder are primarily a white blood cell known as the macrophage. However, during infection there is a shift towards a predominant population of white blood cells called neutrophils. Somatic cells can be quantified in a number of ways, including direct microscopy, the California Mastitis Test (CMT), Wisconsin Mastitis Test, electronic counters or Porta-SCC.

Milk sample collection

General guidelines

  • Wear gloves.
  • Take sample directly from the teat — not from bucket or milk meter.
  • Take sample at start of milking the cow.

Sterile milk sampling

  • Label a sterile tube with cow ID, date and quarter sampled.
  • Prep teat per normal routine.
  • Dry teat thoroughly.
  • Scrub teat ends with alcohol swabs.
    • If collecting more than one quarter, clean far to near.
  • Discard one to two streams of milk.
  • Collect near to far.
    • Hold the collection tube at a 45-degree angle to minimize contamination.
    • Verify the proper cow ID on the collection tube.
  • Freeze samples before shipping.
    • If sample is for mycoplasma, simply refrigerate it.

Figure 2
Milk sample collection guidelines.

As stated previously, the current U.S. legal limit, set by the National Conference of Interstate Milk Shipments (NCIMS), is 750,000 cells per milliliter. However, most research suggest that a normal SCC at the cow level is less than 200,000 cells per milliliter (linear score 4), and hence this is the threshold above which cows are deemed to have subclinical mastitis. Cows that have multiple successive SCCs greater than 200,000 cells per milliliter are considered chronically infected. Therefore, analyzing the percentage of the herd greater than 200,000 cells per milliliter and those chronically above 200,000 cells per milliliter is one way of monitoring udder health in a herd (see Figure 1).

In Figure 1, cows in the upper left quadrant had an SCC less than 200,000 cells per milliliter on the previous test but now have an SCC above 200,000 cells per milliliter, suggesting that they have new intramammary infection (IMI). Cows in the upper right quadrant had an SCC greater than 200,000 cells per milliliter on both the current and the previous test, suggesting that they have a chronic IMI. Goals for udder health using these data would be for less than 7 percent of the cows to have a new IMI, and less than 14 percent of cows to have a chronic infection. A list of these cows can be generated in most dairy software programs and used to selectively culture and potentially cull “problem” cows.

Culture of milk for bacterial organisms can be done at several levels, including the bulk tank, cow and mammary quarter. When environmental mastitis is suspected, bacterial culture of bedding materials may also be warranted. When investigating a herd with a milk-quality problem, bulk tank milk cultures can help distinguish between environmental and contagious bacterial pathogens. For adequate interpretation, bulk tank milk culture data from three successive milk shipments should be evaluated. The milk hauler can take a second sample when taking the sample for bulk tank analysis for the processing plant. The samples should be frozen and then submitted for culture. Multiple samples allow for detecting intermittent shedders as well as evaluating trends in bacterial pathogen presence over time. Evaluation of the bulk tank milk culture data will help define what follow-up data are needed.

In general, if the predominant pathogens in the bulk milk are contagious — such as Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus agalactiae, Corynebacterium bovis or Mycoplasma spp. — individual cows will need to be cultured to determine which cows are the reservoirs. Milk samples for culture should be collected aseptically into labeled sterile tubes (Figure 2). When submitting samples for culture of mycoplasma, ensure that the lab being used does mycoplasma cultures routinely as not all labs perform this test and special media and growth conditions are required for mycoplasma culture. These data will aid in making management decisions about individual cows, such as culling, segregation, milking order and, potentially, treatment. Although a composite milk sample — that is, a sample from all four mammary quarters collected in the same tube — has value, bacterial culture of milk from individual mammary quarters is more specific and allows for making more targeted decisions, such as drying off an infected mammary quarter.

When the predominant bacterial pathogens isolated from the bulk tank are environmental — for example, coliforms or non-agalactiae streptococci — the evaluation of bedding management or paddock condition and environmental hygiene are needed. Muddy paddocks during the first 30 days post calving can be a significant problem. Collecting composite or quarter milk samples from clinical mastitis cases for bacterial culture will help define the pathogens that frequently cause clinical disease and thus lead to informed treatment decisions.

In addition to bacterial culture, some labs offer antimicrobial sensitivity testing. Unfortunately, in the case of mastitis, in vitro, or bench-top, susceptibility testing may overestimate treatment success; and in other instances, because of the delivery of high concentrations of a drug at the site of infection, organisms reported as resistant on the bench top may respond to therapy. Hence, treatment decisions should be based on historical cure rates in the herd for a given bacterial pathogen. Keeping records of clinical mastitis treatment outcomes is thus very important. Incidence of clinical mastitis should be less than 2 percent (two cases per 100 cows at risk) a month. Treatment success can be measured in two ways: resolution of clinical signs, or having two successive test day SCC results less than 200,000 cells per milliliter.

University of Missouri Foremost Dairy somatic cell count (SCC) report by cow

Legend Figure 1
University of Missouri Foremost Dairy somatic cell count (SCC) report by cow showing previous vs. current linear score.

Controlling and preventing mastitis

The National Mastitis Council (NMC) has a 10-step Recommended Mastitis Control Program, which is outlined below.

  1. Establish goals for udder health.
    Set realistic goals for SCC and clinical mastitis rate.
  2. Maintain a clean, dry, comfortable environment.
    Ensure proper stall usage by having adequate stall design, adequate bedding, clean pastures and proper stocking densities, and making sure the cows remain standing after milking.
  3. Use proper milking procedures.
    Examine foremilk to facilitate early detection of abnormal milk and stimulate milk let-down. Allow teats at least 30 seconds of contact with premilking teat disinfectant. Dry teats before attaching units. Wear clean gloves. Attach teat cups within 90 seconds of beginning udder preparation. Adjust clusters that are squawking. Use automatic take offs to diminish overmilking. Apply a postmilking teat disinfectant.
  4. Properly maintain and use milking equipment.
    Service, maintain and regularly evaluate equipment function according to manufacturer’s guidelines. Replace inflations according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Replace broken or cracked rubber and plastic parts in a timely fashion. Sanitize equipment before each milking and thoroughly wash and sanitize equipment using water of the proper temperature after each milking.
  5. Keep complete records.
    For each case of mastitis, record the cow’s ID; date treated; days in milk; quarters affected; number and type of treatment; outcome of treatments; causative agent, if milk cultures were performed; and withdrawal times.
  6. Appropriately manage clinical mastitis during lactation.
    Develop and implement a herd clinical mastitis standard operating procedure (SOP) with your veterinarian. Collect a pretreatment sample from each case of mastitis. Use medicines according to label. Store drugs properly. Clearly identify all treated cows.
  7. Effectively manage dry cows.
    Treat all functional quarters of all cows with a commercially available, approved dry cow antibiotic, an approved internal teat sealant or both. Disinfect teats before and after therapy. Maintain a clean, dry, comfortable environment for dry cows.
  8. Maintain biosecurity for contagious pathogens and marketing of chronically infected cows.
    Request bulk tank SCC and individual cow SCC data on all purchased animals. Culture all purchased cows, and isolate them until you’re assured they do not have an intramammary infection. Segregate cows with persistently high SCC. Cull cows persistently infected with Staphylococcus aureus or other nonresponsive bacteria — Mycoplasma spp., Nocardia spp., Pseudomonas spp. or Trueperella pyogenes.
  9. Regularly monitor udder health status.
    Enroll in a DHI test or processing plant program that will give individual cow SCC and/or use cow-side SCC tests. Culture clinical cases of mastitis, fresh cows, and chronic SCC cows. Monitor mastitis using your records.
  10. Periodically review mastitis control program.
    Obtain an objective program evaluation from a veterinarian, industry field person or extension representative.

Proper milking procedures

  • Maintain a quiet environment.
  • Forestrip all quarters, expressing two to three milk streams from each.
  • Dip teats in disinfectant, allowing 30 seconds of contact time.
    • Dry teats. Use two downward twists.
    • Rub across the teat end.
  • Attach unit 90 seconds after forestrip.
  • Use automatic take off. Postdip teats in disinfectant.

Figure 4
Proper milking procedure guidelines.

Regarding Step 2, the cows’ environment greatly influences their cleanliness. Hygiene scores can be a good indicator of the condition of the environment. The hygiene score most related to SCC is the udder score (Figure 3). A producer can readily score cows as they come through to be milked. The cows’ hygiene can be improved in several ways: fencing off mud holes; improving heat abatement, thereby dispersing cows; trimming tails; cleaning the cows’ freestalls more often; and minimizing overgrazing to maintain adequate grass coverage. Milking without premilking hygiene (cup on) when teats are contaminated with mud and manure is an unacceptable practice.

Regarding Step 4, the goal when milking a cow should be to prepare her for milking in such a way that milk flow is maximized and time on unit is minimized, while ensuring the teat is clean, dry and free of mastitis. Achieving this goal requires proper tactile stimulation and cleanliness before unit attachment. (See Figure 4 for proper milking procedures.) Minimize the time the unit is on the cow when milk flow is low so as to minimize teat end damage. You can get a good indication of the health of the cows’ teat ends just by looking at them. Also, aim for leaving about 1 cup, or 250 milliliters, of milk in the udder at the end of milking. Although undermilking costs producers some saleable milk, overmilking costs producers more through an increased incidence of mastitis.

The National Dairy FARM Program's hygiene scorecard ranges 1 The National Dairy FARM Program's hygiene scorecard ranges 2 The National Dairy FARM Program's hygiene scorecard ranges 3 The National Dairy FARM Program's hygiene scorecard ranges 4
Figure 3
The National Dairy FARM Program's hygiene scorecard ranges from 1 for clean to 4 for dirty. The udder score is the hygiene score most related to milk somatic cell count (SCC).

M188 new September 2013

M188 Dairy Grazing: Milk Quality | University of Missouri Extension