L.I.F.E. The Living Interactive Family Education Program

Home
Children of Incarcerated Parents
  Impacts of parental incarceration
  Magnitude of problem
  Current Research
Enhanced Visitation Programs
  Impacts of enhanced visitation
  What is the LIFE Program?
Impacts of the LIFE program
  Overview of evaluation process
  Program Logic Model
  Focus Group Protocol
  Focus Group Results
  Life Skills Report
  Life Skills Survey
  Video clips of fathers
Related Resources and Links

Family and Community Resource Program

 

 

 

 

The Impacts of Enhanced Visitation Programs:
A Research Synthesis

It is estimated that there are approximately 1.5 million children of incarcerated parents (Mumola 1999, p. 1). Separation from parents by prison can be devastating to children, resulting in feelings of abandonment, sadness, and anger, and can lead to eating and sleeping disorders, lower academic performance, and disruptive behavior (Johnston 1995a, Block and Potthast 2001).

Children of Incarcerated Parents

In a survey of research on the children of incarcerated parents, Johnston (1995a) reviews studies that examine the effects of parental incarceration on children from specific age groups ranging from prenatal to late adolescence.


In middle childhood (7-10 years), parental arrest and incarceration may have major impacts on social adjustment: many children in this age group develop aggressive behaviors and difficulty getting along with others, particularly in school.
Studies on the children of pregnant prisoners indicate that prenatal stress related to the parents' criminal activity (often drug use), arrest, and incarceration can lead to poor perinatal outcomes. Children of pregnant prisoners serving longer terms have better outcomes than those serving shorter terms, possibly due to better nutrition and improved prenatal care in prison. Infants of prisoners appear to experience few direct effects on intellectual and physical development. However, the most important impact of parental incarceration may be the prevention of bonding between the parents and their infants.

As children grow older, the impacts of separation by incarceration appear to become more serious. For children between two and six, ability to develop autonomy and initiative may be damaged by the trauma of the parents' criminal activity and/or arrest and parent-child separation due to incarceration. The long-term impacts of parental incarceration may be worst at this stage, because children can understand and remember traumatic events, but lack the ability to process them without help. In middle childhood (7-10 years), parental arrest and incarceration may have major impacts on social adjustment: many children in this age group develop aggressive behaviors and difficulty getting along with others, particularly in school.

Early adolescent (11-14 years) children of prisoners have typically had multiple experiences with parental crime, arrest and incarceration. While some are able to overcome the absence of a parent by developing stable, productive patterns, many children of prisoners display maladaptive behavioral patterns and reject limitations on their behavior. Late adolescence is the period over which children develop a cohesive identity, the ability to engage in adult work and relationships, and the capacity to become independent and self-sufficient. By this stage of life, many late adolescent children of prisoners have experienced a lifetime of disruption and trauma related to parental incarceration. The cumulative effects of this manifest themselves in decreased likelihood of reunification, increased delinquency, and negative perceptions of the criminal justice system. In summary, parental incarceration and related enduring trauma, separation, and inadequate care interfere with child development, resulting in negative long-term outcomes, including intergenerational incarceration.

The Impacts of Enhanced Visitation Programs

Studies show that frequent, regular visitation is beneficial to children of incarcerated parents: children who visit their incarcerated parents score higher on measures of well-being, IQ, emotional adjustment, and behavioral measures. In a review of important child welfare literature, Johnston (1995b, p. 138) concludes that parent-child visitation produces beneficial effects for the several reasons.

  • Visits allow children to express their emotional reactions to the separation. The more disturbed children are by the separation, the more important it is that visitation occurs.
  • Visitation helps parents to deal with separation and loss issues, increasing their ability to help their children deal with the same issues.
  • Parent-child separation can cause irrational feelings and fears in children about their parents. Visits allow children to deal with those feelings and fears, and help them to form a more realistic understanding of their parents' circumstances.
  • Visits allow parents to model appropriate interactions for children who react negatively to the separation.
  • Visits allow parents and children to maintain their existing relationship, which leads to more successful reunification after incarceration.

Despite the evidence of the beneficial impacts of visitation, child protective services workers, caregivers, and prisoners do not support visitation because they perceive that visitation in the prison setting could have negative effects on children. In addition, prisons are often far away, making it difficult for caregivers to transport children for visits. When visits do occur, standard visitation settings are inappropriate for children, providing little opportunity for meaningful parent-child interaction (Block and Potthast 2001).

Parent-child contact visitation programs, also termed enhanced visitation programs, address the need for extended physical contact between children and their parents. Traditional visitation settings allow only a minimal amount of physical contact, and are extremely restrictive for children who are accustomed to intensive, repeated physical interaction with their parents. In contrast, contact visitation programs allow children and their parents to interact more closely in child-oriented environments, which reduces the amount of stress experienced by parents and children during visitation (Johnston 1995c).

Seeking to normalize interaction between incarcerated parents and their children, several states have developed enhanced visitation programs. These programs provide more flexible visiting schedules, play areas with toys and activities, and longer, more meaningful contact times (Block and Potthast 2001). Such programs view visitation as a beneficial, low-cost intervention that ameliorates the negative impacts of separation, can play a key role in children's future development, and may help reduce future antisocial behavior among prisoners' children (Johnston 1995b).

Very little research has been done on the impacts of enhanced visitation programs. One program that has been evaluated is Girl Scouts Beyond Bars (GSBB), an enhanced visitation program in which incarcerated mothers and their daughters meet twice per month for structured troop activities and one-on-one private conversation. An impact assessment of the program found that compared to a control group, a higher percentage (64 vs. 49 percent) of GSBB participant mothers received visits from their daughters. GSBB mothers also averaged more visits per year (11.6 vs. 6.1) (Block and Potthast 2001, p. 104). In interviews, caregivers indicated that they had observed substantial positive impacts among the children in their care since they began GSBB. These improvements consisted of better communication and understanding between incarcerated mothers and their daughters, a decrease in antisocial behavior at home and at school, and higher self-esteem. The study concludes that child welfare professionals should consider enhanced visitation programs as a means to support parent-child relationships and reduce some of the problems caused by incarceration.

Conclusion

Children can be negatively affected by the incarceration of their parents, sometimes resulting in long-term problems. There is limited evidence to indicate that enhanced visitation programs can reduce the negative impacts of parental incarceration on children. Frequent visitation in a non-threatening environment can lead to improvements in parent-child relationships, which can, in turn, lead to reductions in anti-social behavior and increases in self-esteem among the children of incarcerated parents.

Reference List

Block, Kathleen J., and Margaret J. Potthast. 2001. Girl Scouts Beyond Bars: Facilitating Parent-Child Contact in Correctional Settings. In Children with Parents in Prison: Child Welfare Policy, Program, and Practice Issues, ed. Cynthia Seymour and Creasie Finney Hairston, 93-110. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

Johnston, Denise. 1995a. Effects of Parental Incarceration. In Children of Incarcerated Parents, ed. Katherine Gabel and Denise Johnston, 59-88. New York: Lexington Books.

Johnston, Denise. 1995b. Parent-Child Visitation in the Jail or Prison. In Children of Incarcerated Parents, ed. Katherine Gabel and Denise Johnston, 135-143. New York: Lexington Books.

Johnston, Denise. 1995c. Intervention. In Children of Incarcerated Parents, ed. Katherine Gabel and Denise Johnston, 199-236. New York: Lexington Books.

Mumola, Christopher J. 2000. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report: Incarcerated Parents and Their Children. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.

 

 

 
 

Tammy Gillespie, director of the 4-H LIFE Program, can be reached at 573-882-3316 or gillespiet@missouri.edu.

The project evaluators provided the research and design for this web display.
Dr. Elizabeth Dunn, dunne@missouri.edu
and J. Gordon Arbuckle.

Video footage by William Helvey, Ag. & Extension Information Center, Lincoln University, and
Bob Nash, Mineral Area TCRC Coordinator. Photography by Tammy Gillespie, Lynna Lawson,
Rick Secoy, and Rob Wilkerson. Graphics and web development by Jeanne Bintzer.

This program is supported by the University of Missouri Extension and the
 Children, Youth and Families at Risk (CYFAR) Initiative.


University Outreach and Extension   

University of Missouri Extension does not discriminate on the basis
of race, color, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, religion, age,
disability or status as a Vietnam-era veteran in employment or programs.