2004 - January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December
June
June 6 | June
13 | June 20
|
June
20th observations from the field By Gary Lesoing After last summer most people wouldn’t believe they would say, “I wish it would stop raining.” But many people are saying this after several days of heavy rain have left fields that are saturated and crops that are standing in water. Earlier this month in the Integrated Pest & Crop Management Newsletter, Bill Wiebold, Extension Agronomist discussed the issue of crop response to flooding. In driving through the region this past week I have seen several fields where water was ponding and others where water was running over fields. The primary damage to plants from flooding or ponding is oxygen depravation. Oxygen content in water is much lower than air, even air within the soil. When soils are waterlogged or flooded, there is much less oxygen available to plants. Plant tissues need oxygen for respiration to make high energy compounds that are needed for nearly all other life reactions. Low oxygen availability means the process of respiration slows. If oxygen levels drop too low, plant respiration changes to a pathway similar to fermentation. In this process, energy production can be reduced up to 95 percent. This can greatly reduce yields and if it goes on long enough, some plant tissue dies. The duration of the flood is an important factor on the effect of low oxygen levels on the plants. Local conditions influence the effects, but 36 to 48 hours is often the tolerable limit. Soil drainage properties can aggravate the flooding effect. Soils high in clay content “Gumbo” soils prolong the flooding and remain waterlogged after flood waters recede. In general corn can tolerate flooding better than soybean. Although if flooding occurs in the spring, the corn growing point is near the soil surface or below ground, and may be submersed longer. The soybean growing point is at the tip of the stem and may remain above water. Soybean plants may turn yellow because oxygen for nodule function is reduced. Corn may lose nitrogen from denitrification. In corn, if more nitrogen isn’t added, permanent yield loss may occur. If soil is deposited on the leaves of crops, this reduces photosynthesis because the leaf tissue cannot absorb the sunlight. Finally roots may be damaged making them more susceptible to disease. Finally this is my last radio report for KMZU. I have accepted a position with the University of Nebraska as an Extension Educator in Nemaha County at Auburn, NE to be closer to my family. My job will be similar to what I am currently doing here in Missouri. I have enjoyed my 6 years serving here in Missouri. Agriculture is very strong here and should remain strong with producers, ag industry and the University of Missouri working together. |
|
June
13th observations from the field By Gary Lesoing The rains that have fallen this past week in the region have played havoc with area farmers trying to complete soybean planting. Most areas have received 2-3” of rain on soils that were finally drying out. Most corn is generally looking very good, although there are some spots in cornfields, particularly those in wet, saturated areas that are showing yellowing. If growing conditions improve this may disappear, although some spots may have nitrogen losses. These areas may benefit from nitrogen application. University of Missouri researchers have found significant yield increases by applying nitrogen as late as the silking stage. Nitrogen deficiencies in corn are not only characterized by yellowing, but the bottom leaves will be burning up with a V-shape down the midrib pointing toward the stalk. If corn is too tall to get over with conventional fertilizer equipment, the use of high clearance equipment or an airplane is recommended. If possible it would be more cost-effective to just fertilize areas that visibly show nitrogen deficiencies at higher rates and leave the good areas unfertilized. The wet weather has also been conducive to many of the seedling soybean diseases. Some parts of the region have been very wet and soil has just begun to work well for soybean planting. While there haven’t been too many reports of seedling diseases in soybeans, soybeans that were just planted and then received a heavy rain will be vulnerable. You may want to check recently planted soybeans for disease incidence. With warm soils and plenty of moisture, soybeans should pop right out of the ground and really take off unless they have some seedling diseases, such as Phytophthora or Rhizoctonia. Weed control has been and will be a challenge in fields because of very windy conditions and wet field conditions. Weeds such as waterhemp and sunflowers are really growing in soybeans. It is important to use the recommended rates to control the size of weeds you have, otherwise you may have to spray again. This also increases the potential for herbicide resistance to develop on weeds that are not killed. There have also been reports of spray drift on gardens and horticultural crops, and fields of corn being damaged by spray. Remember to watch the wind speed and always follow label directions. Finally with the rains, more disease is showing up in wheat. Some scab is showing up in susceptible varieties. This is characterized by bleached white heads and some pink or orange mold growth at the base of the diseased head. Bleached heads are usually sterile or contain shriveled or discolored seed. Other fields are showing Septoria leaf blotch on flag leaves or Stagonospora on the heads. Septoria is characterized by brown blotches on the leaves, while Stagonospora shows up as black discoloration on the seed heads. Just this last week, leaf rust has developed in some fields. This will show up as orange pustules on the leaves. Unfortunately it is too late to apply fungicide for control of these diseases. |
|
June
6th observations from the field By Wayne Crook With the recent rains, crops seem to be growing well. With the heavy rains received in some areas of the state in the past few weeks, some questions are beginning to surface about the fate of fertilizer nitrogen in corn fields according to Peter Scharf. He indicated that in Missouri he sees more yellow corn when it turns wet in late May and June than with any other weather pattern. There is cause for concern particularly in fields that stayed at or near saturation for two days or more. High soil temperatures mean that denitrification losses of nitrate from saturated or near-saturated soils run many times faster than they would in March or April. Fields that received fall N applications may be particularly at risk. Corn color is a good indicator of N deficiency. Corn that is in saturated or near-saturated soil will be yellow even if the N has not been lost. Once the soil has been walkable for 4 or 5 days, the color should begin to look much better, if not, major N loss has occurred. In many fields (depending on where you are in the state), there is not much time left to get through with traditional sidedress equipment, so decisions need to be made quickly. A moderate N rate, such as 50 lb/acre, will recover most of the corn’s yield potential without breaking the bank. In fields where the color problem is localized, it is reasonable to consider sidedressing only part of the field. With the excellent planting weather we had earlier, it is approaching the time for the first application of glyphosate to Roundup Ready soybeans. It is important to remember that waiting too long to make the first application can cost you. In some recent research conducted in Nebraska, row widths of 7.5, 15, and 30 inch were evaluated. The results indicated a 5% yield loss when weed removal occurred at V3 for 7.5 inch rows, V2 for 15 inch and V1 for 30 inch rows respectively. These weed removal timings corresponded to 19 days after emergence for 7.5 in rows, 15 days after emergence for 15 inch rows and 9 days after emergence for 30 inch rows. The number of days after emergence will vary by location and growing conditions. This data emphasizes two important points related to weed management in Roundup Ready soybeans. First, the critical time for weed removal comes much earlier in wide rows than narrow-rows. Second, waiting too long to make a glyphosate application will cause soybean yield reductions, regardless of the row spacing adopted. When Roundup Ready soybeans were
introduced, many growers delayed their first application of glyphosate
in an effort to save the costs of a second in-crop application. This
was based on the premise that the cost of the second application would
be greater than the yield and revenue that could be gained by spraying
earlier. With the availability of generic glyphosate, the cost of a
glyphosate is now lower, to where in some instances, the cost of the
custom application is more than the chemical itself. The research in
Nebraska indicated that there is a 2 percent yield loss for each plant
growth stage of delay past the critical time of weed removal. At
current prices, an early and timely application of glyphosate will
almost always offset the loss of revenue associated with yield
reductions of this magnitude, even if a second herbicide application is
needed later in the season.
|
Back to Missouri Valley ICM
homepage
|
|
||||
![]() |
Missouri Valley Integrated Crop Management Site maintained by Brenda Lockard, Office Manager lockardb@missouri.edu Updated 06/03/03 |
![]() |
||