|
Publishing Information
Ag Connection is published monthly for Central Missouri
Region producers and is supported by University of Missouri Extension, the Commercial
Agriculture program, the Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station and the College of
Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources, UM-Columbia. Editorial board: Don Day, Managing
Editor; Mary Sobba, Parman Green, Gene Schmitz, Mark Stewart, Wendy Flatt, Jim
Jarman, Rich Hoormann, Todd Lorenz and Wayne Crook.
Comments or Suggestions?
Please send your comments and suggestions to Don Day,
Ag. Engineer/Information Technology Specialist, University of Missouri Extension, 1012 N.
Highway UU, Columbia, MO 65203, call 573-445-9792, or send messages by e-mail to: daydr@missouri.edu.
To send a message to an author, click on the author's name at the end of an article.
|
- Risk Management Issues
Gambling on the Loan Deficiency Payment
Web Sites That May Be of Assistance
Be Aware of Nitrates in Forages
[This Month
in Ag Connection] [Ag Connection - Other Issues Online]
Risk Management Issues
This issue of Ag Connection is probably the most important
and most challenging issue to date. The goal of this issue is to communicate information
and resources available to assist with difficult financial situations. Hopefully, this
information will help in planning end of the year transactions, and provide insight at
looking at all possible scenarios. Obviously, not all topics can be addressed in a
newsletter, so if you need additional information, contact your county extension center.
Given the weather conditions and commodity prices, this
year will be challenging and stressful. What can you do to ease the stress? Astute
business managers recognize problems early and take action. (In the family budget and the
business operation.) Look at financial records early do not wait until the end of
the year. Give yourself some planning time or time to seek assistance. Make time for
your family do activities together. (it doesnt have to be costly to
have fun).
| Risk comes in all shapes and
forms. While many people focus on just a few of these risks, you must be concerned with
all of them. |
Marketing |
Financial |
International Issues |
Environmental |
Weather/Production |
Farm policy |
Legal/ Regulatory |
Personnel |
Health and safety |
Technology |
Farm Financial Ideas
Given the 1999 Missouri summer weather and agricultural commodity prices, one can conclude that agriculture income will be
low and it is time to consider appropriate responses. Keep lines of communication open
with family members (spouses and children) and farm creditors. Do not hesitate to seek
outside help if you need it.
First you need to determine the impact this year will have
on the farm business? A current balance sheet and cash flow statements for the next few
years will help in determining the position of the farm business. The following are some
suggestions that might be helpful to your situation.
Expenses: Monitor
business and family expenditures closely. If replacement or additional equipment is
necessary, look at alternative methods of acquisition (leasing, joint ownership). Analyze
prepaid expenses will the discounts justify the interest cost?
Marketing:
Marketing and making sales decisions are among the most important jobs of a farm manager.
Study and develop an understanding of a variety of marketing methods to determine the most
profitable for you.
Generating Cash: Evaluate farm assets to determine if all are being fully utilized. If there are
underused or idle assets, seek ways for those items to generate cash. For example, empty
hog buildings or empty cattle lots, can they be rented out? Other opportunities include
custom work and off-farm income, whether it be full-time, part-time or seasonal work.
Government Payments: If the farm participates in government programs, look at all alternatives to
determine which best fits your situation. While the CCC marketing loan provisions provide
price support, you must have production to participate (zero yield = zero LDP). When
looking at the alternatives, keep in mind the tax effects as well.
Tax Planning:
Seeking early advice from your accountant is even more important this year. Several tax
management ideas can help in managing taxes: net operating loss, earned income credit.
Land Rent:
With current commodity prices, it may be necessary to talk with landowners. It may be time
to re-negotiate leases: cash, share-crop, and flexible cash. County Extension Centers have
information about the types of leases.
Farm Enterprises: Take a good look at all enterprises that make up the farm. Are they profitable?
If not, do some enterprises need to be eliminated? Others changed or added? What are the
consequences of those changes? Will there be excess labor? If so, how can that labor be
used to be profitable? If a major enterprise needs to be eliminated, be sure to examine
the income tax effects.
Refinance:
Interest rates are still reasonably low. There may be some opportunity to refinance debt
at lower levels. Calculations will need to be done to see if the cost of refinancing is
lower than the interest savings.
Debt Restructure: Another possibility is moving short-term debt to longer-term debt by
refinancing. Before doing that, look at the farm business to see if it can handle the debt
payments long term.
Rent Out Land: If the enterprises are not producing income, there may be reasons to rent out
the crop ground for a year or two. If this is an option you decide to use, be sure to keep
creditors informed.
Partial or Complete Liquidation: If the decision is made to cut back or discontinue farming, do so
before all equity is gone. Utilize your accountant or attorney to calculate tax
consequences of this decision before liquidating assets.
The above list is only a few ideas. There are still
opportunities in agriculture, but they may not be traditional. For example farmers are
trying and succeeding at growing crops for niche markets such as organic crops,
vegetables, flowers, etc. If you are interested in changes do your homework before the
decision is made. Investigate the crop, markets, and input requirements.
(Author: Mary
Sobba, Farm Management Specialist)
[This
Month in Ag Connection] [Ag Connection - Other Issues Online]
Gambling on the Loan
Deficiency Payment
In the Fall of 1998 farmers became all too familiar
with the term "loan deficiency payment or LDP". And, no decision was of more
interest to program participants than when to take the LDP. The regulations of the loan
deficiency payment stated that a program participant could elect to receive the LDP at any
time during predetermined time limits given the program participant has "beneficial
interest" in the commodity.
| Beneficial Interest. To be eligible
for the LDP, you must have beneficial interest in the commodity. This means you must have
control of the commodity, you must have title to it and you must still have risk of loss
of the commodity. If these tests are met, completing the proper FSA paperwork prior to
harvest and delivery prepares you for collecting the LDP. Caution, some cash grain contracts, seed grower contracts and identity
preserved grain (high oil corn, food grade soybeans, etc.) may cause problems with
maintaining beneficial interest and eligibility for the LDP. Most forward cash
contracts are properly worded and some of the previous problems with seed grower contracts
have been corrected. However, there may still be problems with some of these and
especially some of the more recent identity preserved grain contracts. If you have one of
these contracts and are unsure about it, contact your FSA office for a determination. If
the contract makes you ineligible, it may still be possible to get an addendum to the
contract to correct the problem prior to harvest. Do it now!
After the grain is harvested it will be too late! |
Therefore, a farmer could have sold at harvest and taken
the harvest-time LDP, taken the harvest-time LDP and stored, or stored production and
taken the LDP at a later date not beyond the end of May, 1999.
Many producers who elected to store grain had post harvest
opportunities to take a sizeable LDP payment. Were these good opportunities after allowing
for storage costs? Figure 1 and Figure 2
graph the daily LDP rates for corn and soybeans in Howard county between October 1998 and
the end of May 1999. For each figure, both the actual LDP and LDP adjusted for storage
costs are shown. The gap between the with and without storage cost LDP increases monthly
as storage costs accumulate. The monthly storage costs were assumed to be 3.5¢/bushel for
corn and 4.5¢ for soybeans. Figure 1 and Figure
2 indicate that while post harvest opportunities existed to take an LDP, factoring in
storage costs made taking the harvest-time LDP and selling the grain as profitable for
soybeans and more profitable for corn. Additionally, the market has not allowed for profit
taking from storage beyond the rally in the market during mid December.
Figure 1
Howard County corn loan deficiency payment before and after storage costs (October 1998 to
May 1999).
|
Figure 2
Howard County soybean loan deficiency payment before and after storage costs (October 1998
to May 1999).
|
If the farmer would have elected to take the harvest-time
soybean LDP and store soybeans, he/she would have realized a loss versus storing and
gambling on a LDP increase. For the case of corn, a producer would have been better off
taking the harvest time LDP and storing corn versus storing and gambling on a LDP
increase. The LDP rates are likely to follow a different pattern
in 1999, but before you gamble on a higher LDP make sure you consider storage costs.
Author: Joe Parcell, University of Missouri Extension
Farm Management Spec.
|
|
[This Month in Ag Connection] [Ag Connection -
Other Issues Online]
Be Aware of Nitrates in ForagesWhen forage plants are under water stress and high levels of
nitrogen fertilization, they tend to accumulate high nitrate levels. These nitrates can be
toxic to animals feeding on these forages. Doses not high enough to kill livestock can
reduce milk production, cause abortions, and reduce weight gain from vitamin A deficiency,
thyroid insufficiency, and impaired carotene use.
Some of the forages that accumulate high levels of nitrates
and should be tested are; pearl millet, Sudan grass, corn, orchardgrass, and tall fescue;
smooth bromegrass, timothy and ladino clover accumulate moderate levels; and alfalfa,
Kentucky bluegrass, and wheat accumulate at low nitrate levels.
You may bring a sample of your forage to your local
University of Missouri Extension center to have it tested for nitrates. This test shows
whether or not nitrates are present, but doesn't tell you how high they are. Before you
feed forages this year, it would be wise to have them tested. Forages or feeds that could
be poisonous must be tested further to know the level of nitrates. Then the proper steps
can be taken to insure the safety of livestock.
Points to Consider:
Livestock that are young, old, or in a weakened condition are the most
susceptible to nitrate poisoning.
Nitrate concentrations are not uniform across a field or pasture.
The more plants that are tested from more places will give a better idea of the
situation.
Remember where the samples were taken. Areas of a field or pasture high in
nitrate can be avoided during harvesting or feeding.
Feed green chop while it is fresh. Letting a wagon of green chop sit overnight is
not recommended because the level of nitrate may build up. Forages that may have
high prussic acid concentrations complicate this recommendation. Cyanide found in prussic
acid will be lost during overnight storage.
Making silage may be a solution to salvaging high nitrate forages. Nitrogen is
lost from nitrates in the form of nitrogen oxide during the ensiling process. Extra
caution is needed since nitrogen oxide is a gas toxic to humans and animals that can
collect in the bottom of pits or in unventilated silos. Silage made from high nitrate
crops should still be tested before feeding to determine if there is still a problem.
For more information , see UMC Guide G9811, "Qualitative
Nitrate Detection For Toxicity Potential" or contact your local Extension Center.
(Author: Jim
Jarman, Agronomy Specialist)
[This Month in Ag Connection] [Ag Connection - Other Issues Online] |