|
Publishing Information
Ag Connection is published monthly for Central Missouri
Region producers and is supported by University of Missouri Extension, the Commercial
Agriculture program, the Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station and the MU College of
Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources. Editorial board: Joni Harper, Managing
Editor; Mary Sobba, Parman Green, Gene Schmitz, Mark Stewart, Wendy Flatt, Jim
Jarman, Todd Lorenz, Wayne Crook, James Quinn and Kent Shannon.
Comments or Suggestions?
Please send your comments and suggestions to
Joni Harper, Agronomy Specialist, University of Missouri Extension, 100 E Newton
St., 4th Floor, Versailles, MO 65084, call 573/378-5358 or send messages by
e-mail to: rossjo@missouri.edu.
To send a message to an author, click on the author's name at the end of an article.
|
[This Month in
Ag Connection] [Ag Connection - Other
Issues Online]
Crop Insurance Changes
If you purchased crop insurance on
your 2011 wheat crop, you probably noticed some changes. Risk
Management Agency has been working on the changes for quite some time and
finally those changes begin with 2011 crops.
The Risk Management Agency has released the Common Crop Insurance Policy (CCIP)
or what is now being commonly called the Combo policy. The purpose for
making changes was to simplify the crop insurance choices with one product
the Combo policy. This Combo policy combines existing insurance products
(Actual Production History (APH), Crop Revenue Coverage (CRC), Revenue
Assurance (RA) and Income Protection (IP)) into one policy.
The combo policy applies to the major crops in Central Missouri including
corn, grain sorghum, soybeans, wheat, as well as many other crops.
These changes will not affect the existing group plans (Group Risk Plan (GRP)
and Group Risk Income Plan (GRIP)) since those products are not individually
based.
How does it work? The Combo policy allows farmers to choose one of three
coverage options: 1) yield, 2) revenue or 3) revenue with harvest price
exclusion. These options should sound very familiar to the existing crop
insurance products.
1. Yield Protection Policy – replaces APH policies. This policy will
pay when yields fall below a yield guarantee.
2. Revenue Protection Policy –
replaces CRC & RA with harvest price option. This policy will pay when
revenue is below a revenue guarantee. The guarantee can increase if the
harvest price is above the projected price.
3. Revenue Protection with Harvest Price Exclusion Policy – replaces RA with
base price option and IP. This policy will pay when revenue falls below a
guarantee. With the harvest price exclusion, the guarantee will not increase
if the harvest price is above the projected price.
The new changes will have some benefits. There will now be one set of crop
provisions, one set of actuarial documents and provide more uniformity in
policy acceptance requirements, premium calculations and price discovery.
If you have a carryover policy it will automatically be converted to the
plan closest to your current coverage and no new application will be
required.
It would definitely be a good idea to contact your insurance agent just a
little early to make sure you get the product you want and to ask questions.
Source:
Mary Sobba, MU Extension
Agriculture Business Specialist
[This Month in
Ag Connection] [Ag Connection - Other
Issues Online]
Fall Fertilization
Over the last few years, high fertilizer prices combined with wet falls and
late harvest have resulted in many fields not receiving all of the
phosphorous (P) and potassium (K) needed to maintain optimum test levels.
However, this fall looks promising for P and K applications with the early
harvest and drying soil conditions. With current grain prices, the return on
fertility investment may be greater than when grain prices were lower.
How should the P and K fertilizer be placed? Some placement possibilities
are; incorporation in the soil with tillage, left on the surface, banded on
the surface, or banded deep (4-8 inches) below the surface. However,
University research from the Midwest indicates that how you apply P and K
does not matter. What is important is that you apply it or that you confirm
that test levels are adequate for crop production. Deep banding is sometimes
suggested because it makes the nutrient more available but, the only time
researchers have seen an advantage to deep placement is when soil test
levels are low.

What about annual versus biennial applications? University research
indicates that as long as the needed fertilizer to make sure soil tests
levels are adequate to supply what the crops need, no yield benefit hinges
on whether the application is done every year or every other year. Biennial
application will result in saving time and making one less pass over the
field. Research has shown that with biennial applications it is better to
apply fertilizer before the corn crop and to have soybean as a residual
feeder. If your soil test does not build up, annual applications may result
in better soil test levels.
Is it better to apply P and K in fall or spring? Many studies indicate that
as far as providing nutrients to the crop; neither spring or fall
applications is better at increasing nutrient availability. Fall application
provides the advantage of more time and equipment available than the spring
planting season. Soil compaction is usually less of concern in the fall and
tillage operations are more feasible in the fall. One potential drawback for
fall application is the fact that the nitrogen (N) accompanying P in MAP and
DAP is more susceptible to loss even if applied in the fall. The benefits of
a fall application typically can outweigh the potential for any small N
losses.
It should be noted that if you are following corn with corn; corn can remove
more P and less K than soybeans. Therefore, your fertilization plans should
be adjusted accordingly to your cropping situation.
Source: Wayne Crook, MU
Extension Agronomy Specialist
[This Month in
Ag Connection] [Ag Connection - Other
Issues Online]
Fall Chores
Fall is a time for beef producers to assess the past growing season and
prepare for the upcoming winter months. Evaluating the forage base and
livestock performance can help identify changes that need to be made in
upcoming growing seasons.
1. Pasture and hay fields should be monitored for weed pressure and the
presence of toxic plants. Identify and mark problem areas so they can be
treated in a timely manner next year.
2. Assess grass stands and identify areas for possible renovation to thicken
the stand.
3. Soil test and identify nutrient deficiencies so fertilizer and lime
dollars can be spent more efficiently to correct existing problems.
4. Inventory and quality test hay supplies. Based on the hay test results
I’ve seen so far this year, hay quality
will be relatively poor. Energy content in particular has been extremely
poor. Identify sources of needed nutrients and develop cost-effective
feeding programs.
5. Body condition scoring of the cow herd is essential, especially this
year. Be sure to wean calves before cow body condition is depleted. It will
be expensive to add body condition this year, based on the energy content of
this year’s hay crop. The cheapest way to add weight and condition to cows
before winter is to not let them lose it in the first place. Remember,
adding weight is a function of increasing the energy intake of the animals.
Low levels of protein supplementation will not provide enough energy to
improve body condition. High energy supplements such as grains or grain
by-products will need to be fed, especially if the cows are thin and need to
add condition.
6. Evaluate the performance of the calf crop. How did it compare to past
years? Do changes in the breeding program, such as new bloodlines or
crossbreeding, need to happen? Are cow and heifer pregnancy rates where they
should be? If not, why not? Do you know which cows are performing better
than others? Maybe it’s time to look at production record software to help
manage the cow herd and provide information to make better culling
decisions.
7. Get your hands on a 2011 calendar; make notes on the appropriate months
to identify management priorities for problem areas. These reminders can be
especially helpful with items such as weed control programs. Listing these
management practices will help ensure they are done on a timely basis.
Source: Gene Schmitz, MU
Extension Livestock Specialist
[This Month in
Ag Connection] [Ag Connection - Other
Issues Online]
Taxation Tidbits
Congress has passed another “band-aid” for the struggling economy. On
September 23, the House passed the Senate version of HR 5297 and the
President signed the legislation on September 27. This legislation is
formally known as the Small Business Jobs and Credit Act of 2010.
Let’s delve into some of this legislation’s major tax provisions. Business
capital asset expensing has become
a popular tax incentive for encouraging business asset expenditures. HR 5297
increases the maximum Section 179 expensing amount up to $500,000 per year
for 2010 and 2011. Additionally, the maximum expenditure before the
phase-out of the deduction has been increased from $800,000 to $2,000,000.
The phase-out is dollar for dollar for Section 179 asset purchases over
$2,000,000.
A new feature for Section 179 is that some real property improvement
expenditures will also qualify for expensing. Previously, real property has
been excluded from Section 179 expensing. HR 5297 provides for the expensing
of up to $250,000 for expenditures of qualified restaurant property,
qualified retail improvement property, and qualified leasehold improvement
property.
Another tax provision, first-year 50% bonus depreciation, has been
reinstituted for 2010 and to a limited extent for 2011. Both Section 179 and
the bonus depreciation provisions are retroactive to January 1, 2010. For
the most part bonus depreciation will expire “again” at the end of 2010.
However, HR 5297 extends the benefit of bonus depreciation through 2011 for
qualifying assets with a recovery period of 10 years or longer and for
business tangible personal property used to transport people or property.
Thus for example, bonus depreciation will be extended through 2011 for farm
capital expenditures for general farm buildings and over-the-road tractors
and trailers.
HR 5297 also levels the playing field regarding the tax treatment of health
insurance premium payments – at least for 2010. Prior to this legislation,
the self-employed could deduct the cost of their family’s health insurance
for calculating income tax, but not for calculating their self-employment
tax. HR 5297 makes the cost of health insurance deductible in calculating
income tax and self-employment tax. This provision appears to be available
for only 2010. Certainly many business groups will be lobbying to have the
provision extended.
Late in the tax year legislation and short-duration provisions seems to
occurring with greater frequency. It is unfortunate Congress waits until the
tax year is 9 months old to pass short-term tax provisions designed for
stimulating the economy. However, if you have already made some qualifying
expenditures or are planning some in the near future – this legislation
should save you some tax dollars and be good for your bottom line.
Source: Parman Green, MU
Extension Ag Business Specialist
[This Month in
Ag Connection] [Ag Connection - Other
Issues Online]
Tips for Mowing Leaves

1. A sharp mower blade is more effective, and it may be dull after a long
season of mowing.
2. Do not mow shorter then you normally would, and having the grass a little
longer will allow the leaf pieces to sift down so they are less visible. A
height of 3 to 4 inches is often suggested.
3. Mow before the layer of leaves piles up too high. More than 3-4 inches of
leaves is probably too much. Also, don’t let a dense layer of leaves
(especially wet and matted) lie on turf too long; more then 4 days is not
advised. Given an extended rainy spell, raking may be needed.
4. Don’t mow too fast; the leaves won’t chop up as well. A normal speed, or
slightly slower will work well.
5. Dry leaves chop up better, so this can be DUSTY. Wear a dusk mask over
your nose and mouth as well as safety goggles. Mowing when the leaves are
damp from dew may suppress the dust, but mowing wet leaves doesn’t work.
6. Mulching mowers are preferred, so if using a rotary mower be safe and
inspect and remove any sticks or limbs, they may be somewhat hidden.
Benefits from mowing leaves: Less time, returning nutrients and organic
matter to the turf, and the environmental benefits of reduced smoke, less
landfill waste, less bag usage, and less transportation costs are just a
few.
Source: James Quinn, MU
Extension Horticulture Specialist; Brad Fresenburg, MU Extension turfgrass
Specialist; Dr. Chris Starbuck, MU Extension State Horticulture Specialist
[This Month in
Ag Connection] [Ag Connection - Other
Issues Online]
Beef AI Portable Barns for Rent
Central Missouri cow/calf producers
interested in using artificial insemination (AI) and estrus synchronization
to increase genetic quality and consistency in their herds have access to
tools and facilities to help. Two artificial insemination barns are
available to cow/calf producers in the central Missouri region. The double
stall barn rent is $50.00 per day of use and the single stall barn is $25
per day of use; which will cover maintenance and upkeep on the barns.
The AI barn keeps cattle quieter during the insemination process, making the
insemination process safer and quicker for the
inseminator as well. The dark environment the barn provides makes cattle
easier to handle and inseminate along with providing an indoor environment
for the inseminator to work.
To use the Central Missouri AI barns:
Double Barn: Contact Gene Schmitz, livestock specialist at 660-438-5012.
The charge to use the barn is $50 per day of use.
The barn is located at the Benton County Extension Center in Warsaw.
Single Barn: Contact the Callaway County Extension Office at 573-642-0755
The charge to use the barn is $25 per day of use.
The barn is located in Hermann
Source: Gene Schmitz, MU
Extension Livestock Specialist
[This Month in
Ag Connection] [Ag Connection - Other
Issues Online]
|