|
|||||||||||||
|
Volume 14, Number 10 October 2008 |
|
This Month in Ag Connection | |||||||||||
|
-- |
[This Month in Ag Connection] [Ag Connection - Other Issues Online] Pasture Insurance… New to Missouri [This Month in Ag Connection] [Ag Connection - Other Issues Online] Wood & Corn Stoves as
Alternative Heating Sources The focus of this two-part article will be on the use of wood stoves, pellet stoves and corn stoves for home heating. Pellet stoves burn compressed sawdust pellets that are automatically fed into the combustion chamber from a hopper, while corn stoves burn shelled corn. This month wood stoves will be discussed.
Wood stoves come in many shapes and sizes depending on your application. They can either be freestanding units or be designed to fit into your fireplace opening. Many of these units feature a glass pane in the door so that you can visually enjoy the fire too. There are wood stoves available that can dump heat directly into your existing central heating system or large outside units that boil water to supply heat to your home. For the purpose of this article, the focus will be on the standard “room type” stove. Cast iron is the most popular material for manufacturing wood stoves although steel is also used. Cast iron stoves take a little while to warm up, but they continue to radiate heat after the fire has cooled. Steel stoves heat up quickly but they also cool quickly and tend to wear out quicker than cast iron stoves. To increase a stove’s ability to radiate heat after the fire has gone out, some stoves are lined with firebricks. These bricks absorb heat while the fire is burning and radiate the heat into the room for several hours after the fire has gone out. Some wood stove models can be fitted with small fans and heat exchangers that can further increase their efficiency and your comfort. Earlier, fireplace inserts were mentioned. The reason for considering a fireplace insert is that approximately 90% of the heat goes up the chimney with a conventional fireplace compared to only 40-50% with a wood stove or fireplace insert. Today’s modern downdraft stoves can raise this efficiency even higher by reintroducing and burning some of the hot gases that normally escape up the chimney. The chimney or flue is an import part of your wood burning system that many people erroneously take for granted. Chimneys should be inspected at the start of every wood burning season to ensure there are no cracks in the flue, that the bricks are tight and that there is not an excessive buildup of creosote. It is recommended that you clean the chimney when the creosote reaches a thickness of 1/8 inch to reduce flue fire risks. The fuel value of wood depends on the variety of the wood as well as the moisture content of the wood. Any wood will burn. However, hardwoods make better firewood than softwoods. They produce more heat energy per pound of wood, burn longer, and produce less smoke and soot. The most desirable species for firewood include ash, birch, oak, hickory and hard maple. Second choices include cherry, soft maple and walnut. All these woods are relatively easy to split and light as well as producing few sparks. Properly drying or seasoning the wood is extremely important. Dried wood will ignite more readily, burn hotter and produce less creosote and tar in the chimney. Firewood cut green should cure for a full year for best results. To get your wood to dry quicker, cut the firewood to the desired burning length and then split the pieces to less than 10 inches across before stacking. Large random piles of firewood will not dry as quickly as stacked wood. Stacking the wood allows air to flow around the wood promoting faster drying. Avoid multiple stacks of wood close together that can restrict airflow around the wood. An open shed or other covered storage, open on the sides, helps prevent rewetting from rain and snow. Supplemental heat can be provided for a very reasonable cost by using properly seasoned firewood in a wood stove that is connected to a proper chimney. Thus a wood burning stove can be a very safe and beneficial investment. For additional information, feel free to contact me or stop by your county extension office and ask for guidesheets: Material adapted from an
article by: Jim Crawford, Natural Resource Engineering Specialist. [This Month in Ag Connection] [Ag Connection - Other Issues Online] Cull Cows in the Market Place The 2007 Beef Quality Audit found several improvements since the 1999 audit, but still showed plenty of room for progress especially when marketing cull cows and bulls. According to the audit findings, “producers should market their cattle in a timely and appropriate manner, long before their cattle become too thin or lame for transport”. In other words, producers need to cull their cows and bulls BEFORE they become so emaciated or lame they are worthless or become “downers”. The audit found that producers should consider culling when culls start showing structural and/or other problems, instead of holding onto them trying to get another calf. The longer a producer holds these culls the higher probability that these culls will be condemned at slaughter generating no income. Also the audit noted that producers really need to be more aware of their culling decisions BEFORE they apply insecticides, wormers or inject drugs such as antibiotics into the animal. If the cull is marketed before the withdrawal date is completed, these products can leave residues in the tissues which could lead to not only contaminated beef, but a possible PR nightmare for the beef industry. Everyone affiliated with the beef industry can agree, WE don’t want this.
Smaller producers can expand their marketing opportunities by pooling their cattle resources and forming cooperative marketing agreements with each other. Cattle producers already do this for their feeder calves. What is to say that producers couldn’t do this with their culls as well? This could help increase profitability of the cow/calf operation and help the beef industry as well. Don’t consider culls as a liability; look at these animals as an asset. Marketing culls at the right time can not only improve the perception of the beef industry as a whole but can also mean the difference between profitability and losing money for an operation. For a copy of the 2007 Beef Quality Audit, contact NCBA at http://www.beef.org or call their office in Denver, CO at (303) 694-0305. (Source: Wendy Flatt, Livestock Specialist) [This Month in Ag Connection] [Ag Connection - Other Issues Online] Cull Cow Grades The USDA market news service reports on four classes of cull cows. The four classes are divided primarily on fatness. The highest conditioned cull cows are reported as “Breakers”. They are usually quite fleshy and generally have excellent dressing percentages. Body condition score 7 and above are required to be “Breakers”. The next class is a more moderate conditioned group of cows called “Boners” or “Boning Utility”. These cows usually would fall in the body condition scores of 5 to 7. Many well-nourished commercial beef cows would be graded in this category. The last two groups are “Leans” and “Lights”. These are very thin cows with body condition scores of 1 to 4. They are, in general, expected to be lower in dressing percentage than the fleshier cows and are more easily bruised while being transported than are cows in better body condition. “Lights” are thin cows that are very small and would have very low hot carcass weights. “Leans” and “Lights” are nearly always lower in price per pound than “Boning Utility” and “Breakers”. Lights often bring the lowest price per pound because the amount of saleable product is small, even though the overhead costs of slaughtering and processing are about the same as larger, fleshier cows. How does this impact your income from cull cow sales? Recent Missouri Department of Agriculture price reports for prices received for cull cows in central Missouri livestock markets have “Lean” cow prices at about $0.50 per pound. Prices for “Breaking” and “Boning” were reported at about $0.535 per pound at the time of this writing. Assuming we have a 1,000 pound “Lean” cow at the above price, our returns from this cow are $500. If we add 1 body condition score to this animal (which equals about 100 pounds) and she hits the “Boning Utility” grade, we now have a 1,100 pound animal that is worth approximately $0.535 per pound which brings in $588.50. If you can add 100 pounds to a cow for less than $88.50, you are money ahead to do so. Because of the plentiful rains in much of Central Missouri this summer, many producers have surplus pasture. Dry cows can add weight very quickly on fall pasture. If you have thin cull cows to sell and plenty of fall pasture, consider putting additional weight on them prior to sale. The extra income is sure to be welcome this year. (Source: Gene Schmitz, Livestock Specialist) [This Month in Ag Connection] [Ag Connection - Other Issues Online]
Want to Reduce Waste and Time? Tips for Mowing Leaves
(Source: James Quinn, Horticulture Specialist) [This Month in
Ag Connection] [Ag Connection - Other
Issues Online]
|
||||||||||||
Ag
Connection - Ag Connection Newsletter, October 2008http://extension.missouri.edu/agconnection/newsletters/is-08-010.htm -- Revised: September 17, 2008 rossjo@missouri.edu |
|||||||||||||