|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Volume 7,
Number 4 April 2001 |
|
This Month in Ag Connection | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
[This Month in Ag Connection] [Ag Connection - Other Issues Online]
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
His official final plant stand was 44,000 plants per acre. One of the most important things you can do is insure uniform seed placement, depth and good seed-to-soil contact. Non-uniform plants will do nothing but compete against one another all season long. Though Child's rate is not for everyone |
|
|
He planted his test area at 2 mph. The rest of his farm was at 4 mph. Even though we have improved planters today, we still should not plant faster than 5 miles per hour. |
|
|
Mr. Childs emphasizes that deep, loose soil is important for root penetration. He uses a modified “mini-moldboard” plow that plows 13-14 inches deep and leaves at least 30 percent residue on top. Subsoiling may be necessary in compacted soils. A healthy, high organic matter soil will maintain it’s structure longer following subsoiling and will improve nutrient availability, drainage during wet times and moisture retention during dry times. It is important to realize that increasing organic matter in our soils goes hand-in-hand with profitable farming. It takes time to build it but it can be done with good manure management, crop residue management and high fertility. |
|
|
Fertility is an area that must not be compromised. Childs regularly samples soil in the fall. |
While Mr. Childs used an extremely high rate of nitrogen to produce record-yielding corn in his test area, it’s important to fine-tune exactly how much nitrogen your crop needs and to spread it in multiple applications so excess nitrates will not be a threat to groundwater.
Growers should take the time to gradually whittle away at limitations to their corn crop by paying attention to detail on a field-by-field basis since every field is different. Blanket approaches to growing corn will go unrewarded.
Make sure that a return is received on all inputs into the crop. It will take time to get all your yield-enhancing "ducks in a row". The first step is to set attainable goals and work toward them, keeping close financial records and guarding against possible environmental impacts along the way.
(Author: Tim Schnakenberg, Agronomy Specialist)
[This Month in Ag Connection] [Ag Connection - Other Issues Online]
Soil Test and
Plant Analysis Summary for Year 2000

The University of Missouri Extension Soil Testing labs analyzed about 34,000 soil samples in 2000. Of these, 22,218 were for field crops, 4,403 for lawns and gardens, 826 for commercial fruits, vegetables and turf, and about 6,500 for research. The lab also analyzed 1288 plant samples, 67 water samples, 63 compost samples, 4037 special soil tests (tests other than regular/routine fertility tests). The data has value as a broad assessment of the nutrient status of soils throughout the state of Missouri. A complete report of the Soil Testing Lab can be obtained by contacting Dr. Manjula Nathan at (573) 882-6301.
Crops grown in Missouri generally require a pHs of 5.4 or more for non-limiting growth. Neutralizable acidity is determined by the Woodruff Buffer Method. (Note: Dr. Woodruff will turn 91 this April and at this writing continues to contribute to the University of Missouri from his office in the Natural Resources Building). About 21% of the samples tested lower than pHs of 5.4 (Table 2). About 14% of the samples from corn and soybean fields had pHs ranging from very low to low. The desired phosphorous (P) soil test level for corn and soybean is 45 lbs/acre. For corn and soybean, the desired potassium (K) soil test level for soils with a cation exchange capacity (CEC) of 15 would be 220 + (5 x 15) = 295 lbs. of K/acre.
|
Table 1. Percentage of samples with pHs ranges for corn & soybean fields |
||||||
|
Crop |
Total |
< 4.4 |
4.5-5.3 |
5.4-6.0 |
6.1-7.5 |
>7.5 |
|
Corn (grain) |
4507 |
1 |
13 |
34 |
52 |
0 |
|
Soybean |
2805 |
0 |
14 |
38 |
46 |
2 |
|
Table 2. Percentage of samples within OM ranges for corn & soybean fields |
|||||
|
Crop |
Total |
<0.9 |
1.0-1.9 |
2.0-2.9 |
3.0-3.9 |
|
Corn (grain) |
4507 |
4 |
31 |
40 |
21 |
|
Soybean |
2805 |
1 |
18 |
44 |
31 |
|
Table 3. Percentage of samples within P ranges for corn and soybean fields |
||||||
|
Crop |
Total |
<14 |
15-20 |
23-45 |
46-70 |
>70 |
|
Corn (grain) |
4507 |
6 |
8 |
28 |
28 |
30 |
|
Soybean |
2805 |
11 |
11 |
32 |
23 |
24 |
|
Table 4. Percentage of samples within K ranges for corn & soybean fields |
||||||
|
Crop |
Total |
<65 |
66-110 |
111-220 |
221-330 |
>330 |
|
Corn (grain) |
4507 |
0 |
3 |
29 |
38 |
29 |
|
Soybean |
2805 |
0 |
3 |
34 |
35 |
27 |
Plant Analysis:
The most common problem observed was K deficiency. While some corn samples that were submitted from Northwest part of the state had high K testing soils, they still showed K deficiency. Moisture stress and compaction likely resulted in reduced uptake of K in these fields. Based on plant tissue testing data from the University of Missouri Soil and Plant Testing Laboratory, the incidence of K deficiency in corn and soybean increased from 1998 to 2000. These results indicate that a high proportion of Missouri farmers are at risk of experiencing K deficiency under appropriate environmental conditions. Plant tissue tests help diagnose problems and improve management decisions.
(Author: Todd Lorenz, Horticulture/Agronomy Specialist)
[This Month in Ag Connection] [Ag Connection - Other Issues Online]
Taxation
Tidbits:
Agricultural Inputs -- Exempt from Missouri
Sales Tax or Not
The majority of the inputs
purchased for use in production agriculture are exempt from Missouri sales
tax. Do you know which inputs are not exempt? The Sales/Use Tax Auditors
Training Manual defines exemptions which include:
|
used exclusively for agricultural purposes, |
|
|
used on land owned or leased to produce farm products, and |
|
|
used directly in producing farm products. |
Historically, items had to be tangible personal property at the time of title transfer to qualify. Items that were physically affixed to real property and therefore lost their character as tangible equipment at the time of transfer did not qualify for the exemption. For example, the sale of portable grain bins was exempt, but the sale of non-portable grain bins was taxable.
…farm machinery was exempt, whether or not such machinery or equipment is attached to a vehicle or real property. The rule on bins currently makes the distinction whether it is used during or after production. Feed storage bins are exempt, and grain bins are considered taxable. Repair and replacement parts purchased for use on farm machinery are exempt from tax. Consumable supplies such as grease, oil and antifreeze are not considered parts and are taxable items.
Effective August 28, 1998, Senate Bill 936 added the following exemptions to section 144.030.1(22):
|
all feed for livestock or poultry, regardless of whether the livestock or poultry are to be sold ultimately in processed form or otherwise; |
|
|
adjuvants and foam markers used to enhance the application of pesticides; |
|
|
pesticides and herbicides used in the production of crops, aquaculture, livestock or poultry; |
|
|
lubricants used exclusively for farm machinery and equipment; and grain bins that are used for storage of grain for resale. |
Click here to view the Sales/Use Tax Auditors Training Manual on the web.
In addition to providing criteria and some rationale for why some items are exempt while other items are not – the site provides a link for two fairly comprehensive lists that set forth items that generally do or do not qualify for the agricultural exemption.
(Author: Parman R. Green, UO&E Farm Business Mgmt. Specialist)
Ag Connection - April 2001
http://outreach.missouri.edu/agconnection/newsletters/is-01-04.htm
-- Revised: September 30, 2002
daydr@missouri.edu